February 03rd, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

Stires - The InheritanceThe Inheritance is a quick, exciting read. Its less than 200 pages can be polished off in a single enjoyable sitting. It scores full points for mysteriousness, tenseness, and believable unbelievability. Stires takes his protagonist on an enticingly entertaining yet emotional rollercoaster ride of curiosity, disappointment, disbelief, sarcasm, and need – love and need, hate and need, rage and need, and justice and need. Just about any reader can readily identify with this protagonist; if not directly with the individual, certainly with his decision-making.

I have but two quibbles: The first could have been addressed by more thorough editing. Story and author suffer huge disservice by the numerous typos that unfortunately knock a reader out of sorts. If experienced often enough, a reader can be soured to the entire tale; at the very least discombobulated. Competition for consumer entertainment time is fierce already; no author can afford to defeat him/herself in such a manner.

There was also a wee let-down at the conclusion. After delighting in the rollicking and roaring action from the start, the story seemed to settle into more of an ‘Ooh-ahh’ bystander’s view of the fireworks and explosions come tale’s end. After decidedly NOT playing nice throughout events, the protagonist’s decision to do so at the close was also somewhat surprising.

All in all, The Inheritance is a fine read, and I am delighted to add it to my library. Would I recommend The Inheritance by Christopher Stires to my friends? Yes I would.

You can also find this review on the SFReader.com.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: 2008, YES  | Leave a Comment
February 03rd, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

Zivkovic - Seven Touches of Music

Zoran Živković finds the meaning of life seven times in this collection of ’speculation fiction.’ Too bad it was not seven multiplied by six times. Billed in the marketing material as a ‘story suite,’ Seven Touches of Music is a seven-story examination of the fantastic via the interventions, images, and impacts of music. It is a book of expectations and hopes, about being blind to what arrives when it is not what we expect. It is about being fixated upon a single, specific result, and unsatisfied with the results that truly transpire. It is a book that aspires to creating literary fantasy.

“The Whisperer” is a very well-written, very engrossing, opening story. It was easy to live the events detailed across its pages – and easy to become incensed and disgusted by the defeatism and disbelief of the doctor at its conclusion.

“The Fire” built upon my frustration by delivering a librarian dissatisfied with her incomplete, disconsolate life, who remains unfinished, incapable of more, by story’s end. It left me with a very disturbing image of incompleteness, of a wasted life.

“The Cat” continued to play my emotions by being a very sweet and touching read. The extremely powerful prose of the first half of the tale read so smoothly and irresistibly, I felt as if I were read it, eyes closed, similar to a Garrison Keillor radio story only delivered in person. A lovely experience.

“The Waiting Room” is a series of vignettes, snippets in the lives of others seen through the eyes of another. While simultaneously damning our narrator, music and visions freed her. Not as touching as the previous tales, yet somehow offering something deeper.

“The Puzzle” read like a breeze, a swift, short, fresh breath, despite its length. It was an exploration of purpose and contentment…and the lack of faith.

“The Violinist”…Oh, so much painfulness here, so much unnecessary futility. So much ‘what-could-be-if-only’ – and all of it, all of it!, sundered, stolen away.

“The Violin-Maker” is the longest, most thorough tale – yet it left the most unanswered. I thought it led a certain way, only to be led another: nowhere and incomplete, leaving me cheated and disappointed.

(An unusual characteristic common to all the tales and one I am not sure I understand, is the forced formality of Mr./Mrs. preceding the first name of most all the characters. Nor am I clever enough to distinguish what, outside age possibly, precisely sets apart the very few who are not so painstakingly codified.)

Seven Touches of Music is a book about music and the hopes it creates, the futilities it delivers. It tells a melancholy tale. It is, perhaps, a glimpse into the reasons Beethoven slammed his head upon the piano and his fingers upon the keys. Filled with so much that is senseless, even pointless, it is a book of sadness which, often not, is the ingredient that makes literary possible. A thought voiced on page 96 offers possible explanation for it all: This at least gave a semblance of meaning to everything. And one could not live without some meaning, however illusory.

Yet this too is untrue. As a book of individual hope and short-sightedness coupled with universal ignorance and futility, it is ultimately depressing. It offers no escapism, no illusion; nothing but a slap in the face and a forced facing of reality rather than idealism, viewed via a fixated blindness rather than boundless vision. As an attempt at ‘literary fantasy’ it fails miserably, for there is little of the speculatively fantastical beyond its trappings. An often breathtakingly admirable attempt it most certainly is, but each story removes itself further and further from the realm of fiction until the whole is nothing more than a series of incomplete speculations upon the nature of music and what it triggers in the human psyche. Such speculations are more clinical analysis than exploratory contemplation; more fact-finding than fun-filled. Inspired it may be, but it is more about the fiction than the fantasy of speculation. Why is it that what is literary is so often so bleak? Would I recommend Seven Touches of Music by Zoran Živković to my friends? No, I cannot recommend it for the enjoyment of my friends. At least, not my kind of friends. On a scale of 1-10, I shall grade it a 9.5 in terms of the quality of writing and storytelling, a 2.5 in terms of the speculative.

You can also find this review on the SFReader.com.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: 2008, NO  | Leave a Comment
January 29th, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

Superstars Writing Seminar – March 19-21, 2010

Superstars they are. Market master Kevin J. Anderson and his CEO wife Rebecca Moesta are joined by phenom Brandon Sanderson, popular Eric Flint, and the respected David Farland. It does sound like an amazing seminar, though it is the accolades listed upon the right-hand side of the website that impress me most.

I sat beneath the tutelage of Anderson and Moesta during a two hour session on the business of being a professional writer at Dragon*Con ‘09. It was a powerful session delivered by determined professionals. I can imagine what three days of that atmosphere could do for a writer’s mindset and career. I’d be highly interested in hearing from anyone who’s attended one of these, or other like sessions by any of the listed superstars. Shoot, who am I kidding? I’d be extremely agreeable to hearing from anyone who’d like to sign me up and send me off to it. I think I can make room in my schedule.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Authors, Writing  | 2 Comments
January 26th, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

I’ve never really been enamored with overtly humorous speculative fiction. Entertaining ridiculousness is one thing (a la Douglas Adams’ Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy), but the pun-filled prose of Piers Anthony has never caught my attention (though I loved his Incarnations of Immortality series…when he stuck to his original intent to keep it at 5 books). One doesn’t really read the Hitchhiker trilogy (of 5 books; or is it 6?) for humor to begin with.

This of course does not mean that I am adverse to comedy. A competent writer will strive to incorporate all of the senses within his writing – and laughter is such an integral part of the human psyche and life itself that to write without it would be almost sacrilegious. Just as romance and mystery are present in most every tale, so too should it be true of laughter. After all, it is the same world that Horace Walpole speaks of when he says that “Life is a tragedy to those who feel, a comedy to those that think.” The Greeks deemed it important enough to include elements of both in every play.

Taking all the above into consideration and understanding that my lack of interest in reading (personally or in slush) humorously slanted material has troubled some in the past, I thought I would salute my definition of quality humorous speculative fiction with this perfect example recently read.

I am currently reading the 1983 anthology The Year’s Best Fantasy Stories: 10 edited by Arthur W. Saha. A complete review will follow at some point, but I wished to acknowledge the short story “Green Roses” by Larry Tritten as what I appreciate most about a tale obviously considered humorous.

This is an entirely humorous tale without a shred of slapstick, stupidity, unwarranted sarcasm, or superiority. Nothing is overdone and, quite frankly, there exist no singular moments of humor. This is neither the humor of Laurel and Hardy or The Three Stooges; nor even that of the Smothers Brothers or Abbot and Costello (my preferences in old-time comedic routines). Not pun or prattle or practical joke; not sass or silly or sophomoric.

From first word to last, beginning with the wonderful quietly, excitingly, suggestive lead, and consorting with fancifully self-named demons, a string of most unfortunate events, an inglorious bastard of a demon, and a clever drunk, this story is the prime example of quality humorous speculative fiction. My first contact of recollection with Larry Tritten has convinced me to find more of his material. There are no guarantees that even he will ever reproduce this ideal of mine again, but he has successfully convinced me to give him the chance. Which is all the result that any author can hope to achieve.

Ironically enough, within this very same anthology follows another tale of humor that I would label slapstick and silly…yet oddly delightful. Perhaps without the stage set by Mr. Tritten’s tale nor its editor’s prelude I would not have found it so, but in this instance it did not displease me. For now, however, I shall remain silent on further tales, as this post is in recognition of “Green Roses” and what it means to me. I recommend you read it.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Writing, von Darkmoor  | 3 Comments
January 22nd, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

While funny – and sad (the epitome of the over-under shotgun of drama) – listing this as first among Query Letter No-Nos is a bit far-fetched. Though after viewing the Top 10 list, it does take the cake of cliched errors in judgment.

I do recommend subscribing to the free Writer’s Digest e-newsletter, for there’s always something to be picked up, something to be learned or observed, something to be added to the toolkit. However, in this instance the editor’s letter, while doing its job in compelling me to follow the link to the article, actually ended with a negative result.

For when one exuberantly cries, “Here’s a list of 10 Query Letter No-Nos that you should consult before sending out every query letter. Consider it a final-edit checklist” one should realize that almost everyone who reads that will follow the link – expecting at least one (but more like 50+%) of the 10 golden nuggets to NOT be fool’s gold. This is, after all, billed as the ‘final-edit checklist’ one ’should consult before sending out every query.’

There’s nary a sliver of gold on the list, unless one seeks only entertainment.

No fault lies with list author Ann Rittenberg (unless she equally mislead in its presentation in its original source, Your First Novel, which I have no reason to suspect); this humorous though singular waste of my time is due entirely to the presentation decision of Newsletter Editor Klems. Although he did help me generate another post on the long-dormant-yet-struggling-to-revival von Darkmoor’s thoughts ;)

Presentation, my dear Watson; it’s all in the presentation. Or as someone else once put it, presentation, presentation, presentation!

Rating 3.50 out of 5
[?]
Category: Submitting, Writing  | 3 Comments
January 19th, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

Of all the stats being thrown about in the discussion of e-publishing, e vs. print sales, e-readers, e-this and e-that, this is the very first stat to grab my attention. Literally twist my head to look right at it.

Publishers Weekly sites a recent 9-month survey “of hundreds of e-book consumers” by the Book Industry Study Group (BISG), and says that it is the first of three such reports due in 2010. The Consumer Attitudes Toward E-Book Reading study claims to be “[t]he first comprehensive survey of U.S. e-book consumers’ behavior and preferences…with the goal of understanding their real-time purchase and reading habits.”

The intentions of all statisticians and statistical displays of course being all good and well and all that, if you’re lucky enough to be a BISG member, you can read the entire survey and view the exact stats for a measly $150. Outside that slim chance, however, you’ll have to rely upon the relayed opinions of ‘hundreds’ of surveyed e-book consumers when evaluating this revelation. Disregarding also such phenomenally blatant misrepresentations by Amazon as its claims that e-books outsold print.

It can be agreed that consumers of books, or reading material, are altering their reading and purchasing habits. The economy is certainly a factor in this, as is society, status, cultural mores, et cetera et cetera. Figure just plain interest as well. Have any studies distinguished between the e-material consumption of fiction, non, and reference? Between age and income levels? Reasons for e-consumption? Location of said consumption? All of these factors play into the results of a survey that is conducted upon the slimmest of market shares.

After all, the percentage of the public who are actually reading (anything at all) shrinks yearly. Restrict it further to those of technological bent and you’ve effectively severely reduced the numbers by eliminating the techno-deficient, be it self-imposed (via reasons of anti- or aging or desire) or economic (via reasons of cost or time or locale). So, while a stat that declares “nearly 20% of respondents say they’ve stopped buying print books in favor of buying e-books” is enough to give one whiplash, ensuing reflection upon its source helps one realize that change has not occurred near as much as we are led to believe.

Nor so much as Amazon’s Jeff Bezos may believe, despite his apparently saying “that he believes that the print book will eventually disappear” (quite possibly way back in this 2007 interview with Charlie Rose – at 54 minutes long, I don’t have the time nor inclination to listen, but I haven’t been able to find any other direct attribution).

I am certain that both the number of folks reading electronically and purchasing e-texts will increase, especially in the environments of academia and industry. I am equally certain that hard copy texts will not vanish from Earth.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
January 15th, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

Rogue Blades Entertainment’s entry in this year’s Preditors & Editors Readers’ Poll more than held its own on the individual story level. With 10 of the 21 stories in Rage of the Behemoth appearing in the final cut as of the close of voting last night, that’s pretty darn sweet in my view. All of those authors should be very happy, especially the three who so far appear in the Top 10.

Final placements won’t be revealed for a bit, but as of right now this is how things stand:

  • Short Story Science Fiction/Fantasy
    • 1-T — Yaggoth-Voor, Bruce Durham
    • 6 — Poisonous Redemption, Kate Martin
    • 10-T — Where the Shadow Falls, TW Williams
    • 14-T — Thunder Canyon, Jeff Draper
    • 16-T — Vasily and the Beast Gods, Daniel R. Robichaud
    • 17-T — As from His Lair, the Wild Beast, Michael Ehart
    • 17-T — The Wolf of Winter, Bill Ward
    • 18-T — Portrait of a Behemoth, Richard K. Lyon & Andrew J. Offutt
    • 18-T — Runner of the Hidden Ways, Jason Thummel
    • 18-T — Beyond the Reach of His Gods, Brian Ruckley
  • Anthology
    • 21-T — Rage of the Behemoth
  • Artist
    • 20-T — Johnney Perkins
  • Book Art
    • 19-T — Rage of the Behemoth, Didier Normand

~~~~~~

Hat’s off to many other friends and acquaintances for their multiple showings as well, folks such as Cyberwizard Productions and Abandoned Towers; Residential Aliens, SFReader, Black Gate, Beneath Ceasless Skies, Heroic Fantasy Quarterly, Ricasso Press, GUD, EDF, Richard H Fay, Grasping for the Wind, M.D. Jackson – and numerous others I apologize for not listing.

A grand beginning to 2010 and much publishing success to us all!

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
January 11th, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

Watch Batman Unmasked: The Psychology of the Dark Knight -- A single 46-minute video (subtitled in English) -- or the below 5-video set from YouTube (subtitled in Spanish).

Impressive analysis of the mind of iconic characters -- be they dark or darker yet. While this is a study of the Batman and his motivations, it is also an acknowledgment and acceptance of his counterparts. Without them, there is no he. It could equally be argued that without ‘he’ there is no ‘them’ either.

First aired in 2008, I accidentally found it late one night last week. While nothing that I did not know or could not surmise was presented, the way the analysis was assembled and delivered is compellingly entertaining and illuminating. Combining actual psychological concepts and thoughts with those of creators, writers, actors, directors of the Batman was fascinating. I’d love to see an entire series of such shows, compiling a collection of dozens of the larger-than-life characters many have come to idealize, idolize, and love.

Granted there would be repetition of content such as motivations and psychoses, even origins and conflicts. Yet combining the audio, video, and paper media life of each character with the thoughts of those who’ve written, played, studied, directed, colored, lived them and the observations of some top analytical minds appeals greatly to me. Imagine the unmasking of:

  • Solomon Kane
  • Aragorn
  • John Carter
  • Wolverine
  • Casca
  • Merlin
  • The Shadow
  • Conan

What fun these would be to watch!

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
December 31st, 2009 | Author: von Darkmoor

Happy New Year’s!

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: von Darkmoor  | One Comment
December 16th, 2009 | Author: von Darkmoor

Take it for what it’s worth (exactly what I am not sure), but here’s a listing of what Box Office Mojo says are the top grossing S&S movies since 1980.

Sword & Sorcery Movies at the Box Office

I find it interesting that they list Eragon but none of the LotR series.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Visual Arts  | 6 Comments