Archive for » 2008 «

December 30th, 2008 | Author: von Darkmoor

Lou Anders and Jonathan Strahan promise much.

What’s exciting – and interesting – is that they are well on the way to delivering. They’re playing things a bit close at the moment, but an accumulation of posts has revealed a few tidbits. I plan to keep on eye on this, as this anthology of Sword and Sorcery (Oh! Didn’t I mention what this was about?) has large aspirations . . . and the potential to surpass them. Here’s the lowdown as I’ve followed it:

A few early hints were scattered on Strahan’s blog Notes from Coode Street, but the unveiling actually occurred May 30, 2008:

… I mentioned to Lou that I’d had this idea of editing an anthology that collected new stories from some of the really cool newer writers who were writing swords and sorcery at the moment, and mentioned a list of writers. Lou basically looked at me and said “Me too”. …

Followed by Anders on his blog Bowing to the Future also May 30:

… I started musing . . . that Swords & Sorcery was due a come-back. Or rather, that the rather sophisticated S&S that was already being written was due its musical chairs spot at the front of the class (which is really all a comeback is). … (there’s a fascinating exchange in the comments on what S&S actually is, with input from Black Gate’s Howard Andrew Jones)

Then came an Anders post at Fantasy Book Critic on December 18:

ON THE HORIZON FOR LOU ANDERS:… “Conquering Swords” (working title), co-edited with fellow Hugo-nominee Jonathan Strahan, a definitive Swords & Sorcery collection. … (with a few comments from yours truly) 

And Strahan on December 18 (anyone seeing a pattern here?):

Conquering Swords is a big swords and sorcery anthology I’m co-editing with my pal Lou Anders.  We already have some great stories by Glen Cook, Steven Erikson, and James Enge, and are working away as others come in. …

And a brief mention by Strahan December 30:

… I’m also thumbing through James Enge’s first novel, Blood of Ambrose. . . . It’s edited by my good friend and collaborator Lou Anders and Enge has written a terrific short for Lou and my anthology, Conquering Swords

And that’s it folks. All the news I’m aware of. It ought to be enough to get the juices flowing, too. :) Throw two highly-regarded editors at one of the cornerstones of heroic fantasy adventure and start accumulating names like Cook and Erikson and Engeand we have the makings of a killer anthology. Definitely something I will read. That said, let’s all starting muttering prayers to Crom now that this project won’t change course like another recent promising one.

Rating 4.33 out of 5
[?]
Category: Books  | 2 Comments
December 23rd, 2008 | Author: von Darkmoor

This doesn’t bother so much:

After receiving lots of feedback from fans, readers and industry alike, we at the DGLA have – after much deliberation – come to the decision to make the David Gemmell Legend Award completely publicly voted.

This means that once the Longlist closes, the top 5 novels will be put forward to the Shortlist Poll and YOU will be able to have the final say about who should win, by voting once more on the shortlist! Readers and fans will be involved at every step to produce our winner.

This bothers immensely:

We are confident that Fantasy readers are passionate and well-informed about the genre and, will select the novel that they have found to be both the most exciting read, and a truly deserving representative of the sheer quality and skill of the Fantasy genre and its authors.

So, okay, they want to leave the results entirely in the public’s hands. We’ve already had our discussion about the merits (or non) of that, so I’ll leave that alone. But the second half of the announcement isn’t much to my liking. Notice the absolute absence of any reference to Mr. Gemmell. Not only would this have been the appropriate place to restate the name of the man in whose honor this award originates, it would have been correct to reiterate the intent of the award.

Even the main page of the DGLA site has been tweaked. “The DGLA will be presented for the very first time in 2009 for the best Fantasy novel of 2008. The award will be given to a work written in the ’spirit’ of the late, great David Gemmell, a true Master of Heroic Fantasy.” Second sentences in definitions tend to disappear over time, especially when all that would be necessary to improve the first is one word – ‘Heroic.’ I would argue that it would be both nicer and (hopefully) more accurate to simply say “The  DGLA will be presented for the very first time in 2009 for the best Heroic Fantasy novel written in the ’spirit’ of the late David Gemmell published in 2008.

I’ll admit to not being so well read on many of these titles, but in reviewing the list and noting those titles I am aware of, reading this apparent redirection of the intent of the award, and now learning all will be determined by the public, this award has lost the shine it initially held for me. A popularity contest with muddled intent and absent minders will not find the 2008 work that best reflects Mr. Gemmell’s contributions to the heroic fantasy genre. I’m afraid we don’t have to wait till June to learn what many of us feared: Snaga’s edge has already dulled.

Rating 4.33 out of 5
[?]
Category: Awards  | 20 Comments
December 19th, 2008 | Author: von Darkmoor

John Ottinger and Grasping for the Wind need help. Even from those of us who may be slacking in the timeliness of our reviews.

If you review speculative fiction literature, take this mega-meme, add it to your site, and add your url to it. John’s done the hard work of assembling the whole thing via back links, track backs, piggybacks and ping pongs. Or whatever. It might be sonar pings for all I know :)

Last but not least, check out the list for yourself. Find a new reviewer, visit a forgotten one. What helps one of us helps us all! ’tis the season, after all.

Enjoy!

A

7 Foot Shelves
The Accidental Bard
A Boy Goes on a Journey
A Dribble Of Ink
A Hoyden’s Look at Literature
Adventures in Reading
The Agony Column
Andromeda Spaceways
The Antick Musings of G.B.H. Hornswoggler, Gent.
Ask Daphne
aurealisXpress
Australia Specfic In Focus
Author 2 Author

B

Barbara Martin
Bees (and Books) on the Knob
Bibliophile Stalker
Bibliosnark
BillWardWriter.com
The Billion Light-Year Bookshelf
Bitten by Books
The Black Library Blog
Blog, Jvstin Style
Blood of the Muse
The Book Bind
Bookgeeks
Bookslut
The Book Smugglers
Bookspotcentral
The Book Swede
Bookrastination
Breeni Books

C

Cheaper Ironies [pro columnist]
Cheryl’s Musings
Critical Mass
The Crotchety Old Fan

D

Damien G. Walter
Danger Gal
Dark Wolf Fantasy Reviews
Darque Reviews
Dave Brendon’s Fantasy and Sci-Fi Weblog
Dear Author
The Deckled Edge
Dragons, Heroes and Wizards
The Discriminating Fangirl
Dusk Before the Dawn

E

Enter the Octopus
Eve’s Alexandria

F

Fantastic Reviews
Fantastic Reviews Blog
Fantasy Book Critic
Fantasy Cafe
Fantasy Debut
Fantasy Book Reviews and News
Fantasy and Sci-fi Lovin’ Blog
Feminist SF – The Blog!
The Fix
The Foghorn Review
Frances Writes
From a Sci-Fi Standpoint
Fruitless Recursion

G

The Galaxy Express
Galleycat
The Gamer Rat
Genre Reviews
Graeme’s Fantasy Book Review
Grasping for the Wind
The Green Man Review

H

Hasenpfeffer
Highlander’s Book Reviews
Horrorscope
The Hub Magazine
Hyperpat’s Hyper Day

I

Ink and Keys
io9

J

Jumpdrives and Cantrips

K

L

Lair of the Undead Rat
League of Reluctant Adults
Literary Escapism

M

Michele Lee’s Book Love
The Mistress of Ancient Revelry
MIT Science Fiction Society
Monster Librarian
More Words, Deeper Hole
Mostly Harmless Books
My Favourite Books

N

Neth Space
The New Book Review
NextRead

O

OF Blog of the Fallen
The Old Bat’s Belfry
Outside of a Dog

P

Paranormality
Pat’s Fantasy Hotlist
Piaw’s Blog
Post-Weird Thoughts
Publisher’s Weekly

Q

R

Realms of Speculative Fiction
Reading the Leaves
Reviewer X
The Road Not Taken
Rob’s Blog o’ Stuff
Robots and Vamps

S

Sandstorm Reviews
ScifiChick
Sci Fi Wire
SciFiGuy
Sci-Fi Fan Letter
Sci-Fi Songs [Musical Reviews]
The Sequential Rat
Severian’s Fantastic Worlds
SF Diplomat
SF Gospel
SF Reader
SF Reviews.net
SF Revu
SF Signal
SF Site
SFF World’s Book Reviews
Silver Reviews
Smart Bitches, Trashy Books
Speculative Fiction
Speculative Fiction Junkie
Speculative Horizons
The Specusphere
Spinebreakers
Spiral Galaxy Reviews
Spontaneous Derivation
Sporadic Book Reviews
Stella Matutina
The Sudden Curve
The Sword Review

T

Tangent Online
Tehani Wessely
Temple Library Reviews
Tor.com [also a publisher]
True Science Fiction

U

Un:Bound
Urban Fantasy Land

V

Vast and Cool and Unsympathetic
Variety SF
von Darkmoor’s thoughts

W

Walker of Worlds
Wands and Worlds
The Wertzone
With Intent to Commit Horror
WJ Fantasy Reviews
The World in a Satin Bag
WriteBlack

X

Y

Young Adult Science Fiction

Z

Non-English Language

Cititor SF [Romanian, but with English Translation]

Elbakin.net [French]

Foundation of Krantas [Chinese (traditional)]
The SF Commonwealth Office in Taiwan [Chinese with some English essays]
Yenchin’s Lair [Chinese (traditional)]

Aguarras [Brazilian, Portuguese]
Fernando Trevisan [Brazilian, Portuguese]
Human 2.0 [Brazilian, Portuguese]
Life and Times of a Talkative Bookworm [Brazilian, Porteguese]
Ponto De Convergencia [Brazilian, Portuguese]
pós-estranho [Brazilian, Portuguese]
Skavis [Brazilian, Portuguese]

Fantasy Seiten [German, Deustche]
Fantasy Buch [German, Deustche]
Literaturschock [German, Deustche]
Welt der fantasy [German, Deustche]
Bibliotheka Phantastika [German, Deustche]
SF Basar [German, Deustche]
Phantastick News [German, Deustche]
X-zine [German, Deustche]
Buchwum [German, Deustche]
Phantastick Couch [German, Deustche]
Wetterspitze [German, Deustche]
Fantasy News [German, Deustche]
Fantasy Faszination [German, Deustche]
Fantasy Guide [German, Deustche]
Zwergen Reich [German, Deustche]
Fiction Fantasy [German, Deustche]

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Reviewing  | 2 Comments
December 16th, 2008 | Author: von Darkmoor

If only it worked that way.

Macmillan – you know, the publisher that just eliminated 64 jobs, froze salaries above $50k, consolidated much of the house in a major restructuring, and is downgrading the annual BookExpo America booth – boss John Sargent hopes so at least. Sargent insists that there will be no reduction in their title list, and explains that these are cost-saving moves being done across the company. Consolidation, retooling, refocusing, reinventing – I like all these terms. Downgrading, combining, eliminating redundancy . . . again, nice-sounding terms. Sounds like outside-of-the-box thinking to me.

I hope it carries over to the marketing side of publishing. To the distribution side. To the contractual side. How about enforcing contract language that limits returns? Now that would be a cost-saving move, wouldn’t it? How about uniformity, even equality, in book promotion? Rather than singularity through brow-beating emphasis, mass appeal of multiple titles. Twenty titles selling 100k copies each is twice as better than one title selling 1mil. I’d think it’s easier to accomplish, too. I’ll have to let you know though.

So much could be said with a title like these words I pulled from Sargent’s mouth (thanks Publishers Weekly!). They’re applicable to far more than just the publishing world, the writing life, the folks who visit here. I know they could be repeated at my place of work. The definitely can be used in my writing. 

And so it comes full circle: the publishing world has the chance to shake things up right now. To reestablish the rules as it were. We are the product providers, aren’t we? We write the words, we produce the texts. The Internet is at our fingertips. Publishers are moving into Hollywood studios – why not into book sellers’ storefronts? They need us more than we need them – if only we would realize that.

Stop doing ineffective things should have been said long ago.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Publishing  | 4 Comments
December 13th, 2008 | Author: von Darkmoor

If you have not checked out Tor Books’ Internet presence yet, you really should. They’re putting together a marvelous site filled with information about the publishing industry, stories, and blogging, all presented through the many available facets of multi-media online goodness. It is not, however, a site junior should be granted free access to – vulgarity abounds. Seems counterproductive in the long run, as the site’s aim appears to be to establish itself as one of the ‘must-visit’ sites in the SF community.

Recent interesting tidbits gleaned from Tor.com include:

  • a spectacular analysis of Robert E. Howard’s Solomon Kane by Douglas Cohen (part of a mini-series on heroic fiction he’s been posting)
  • a terrific example of how SF has hit mainstream. Acceptance for use as a marketing ploy must mean that, right? It’s almost as good as sex (A 1000% boost?!!), and you don’t even have to tie product and marketing together until the final 3 seconds.

Featured works, authors, artists; movie, author, book, actor, publisher updates; daily-blogging and commenting from numerous folks, including many well-known names. Tor.com has a good start on gathering it all together here. 2009 may make it the SF place to be.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: von Darkmoor  | 3 Comments
December 12th, 2008 | Author: von Darkmoor

Narrator: The following story is the truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God. I relay this sorrowful story, this horrible happening, this stupid-endous saga, from the agony of first-hand experience. Hush now, as we enter a scene of terrible travesty and wrenching woe to find our hero held at bay by the edged tips of sharpened wits and poignant helpfulness . . .

Jason: Uh, hi, yeah, can you explain why this properly addressed and stamped flat rate priority mail envelope was returned with a “not deliverable as addressed” stamp after I’ve mailed several things to this gentleman’s address before, verified the address both in my records and directly with him, and mapped the address directly to his door with Google Maps?

US Post Office (1 person): We see you and we hear you sir, but we cannot take you at your word. First, we’ll enter the address ourselves to find out if it’s a real address. Okay, yes it is. Next we’ll study the postage . . . oh, this is wrong. This isn’t a flat rate priority mail envelope.

J: But yes it is, see right here where it says ‘flat rate mailing envelope’ and ‘priority mail’?

USPS (now 2 people): Oh, yes, you’re right. Hmm. Well you shouldn’t have mailed it in this envelope. This is all wrong.

J: Really? I’ve made mailings like this oh, about 100 times since March when I started doing this and came in here – yes, to this post office – and demonstrated what I would be mailing and asked what my best mailing options where. I was told this envelope and I’ve always used this flat rate priority mail envelope. I’ve successfully sent them to New York, Atlanta, Portland, Seattle, Australia, Great Britain, Canada . . . need I go on? Notice I did say ‘Seattle’?

USPS (now up to 3 people): Really? Hmm. Well then. I still say you shouldn’t have used this envelope. Sure, the weight is a little high and does put the cost above the standard non-flat rate envelope, but you should have used that.

J: Isn’t it the same size?

USPS (in unison): Yes. And it will be $10.35 instead of $4.80.

J: Really? Huh. What other option do I have?

USPS (in perfect harmony): Well, then, um, the priority mail flat rate box. Yeah, that’s it. The next size is the box.

J: Won’t that require padding to fill the box?

USPS (down to 2 people): Yes, I’m sure it would, as it’s much larger than this package. And it won’t be $4.80.

J: Yes?

USPS (a duet): No, it will be $9.00 something.

J: So I should be using a flat rate box that will cost me more money and require me to assemble and put padding inside instead of this cheaper flat rate envelope that I’ve successfully used 100s of times over the last 9 months? I always ask the people who receive these what the condition of the envelope and book(s) are. Even though the envelope is often beat up, I’ve never had anyone say a book was damaged. And this is the first envelope that’s come back to me in all this time. From an address I’ve mailed to before and know exists.

USPS (back to 1 person now): Really? Well, yes, that is an address as far as we’re concerned. We have no answer why the Seattle office would have done this. We can’t find anything wrong with this.

<silence>

J: So can we take care of this?

USPS (solo singer): Ah, sure. Here’s the flat rate box. That’ll be–

J: Um, I don’t want the box. And isn’t the USPS going to take care of this?

USPS (back to 2 people now): You don’t want the box?

J: No.

USPS (really squawking together now): You want us to take care of this?

J: Yes.

USPS (full choir): We can’t take care of this. What do you mean, how could we take care of it?

J: Well, I sent time-sensitive material to a real address in a priority USPS envelope. The USPS didn’t deliver it and sent it back. You can’t find any reason why. You agree that the address exists. I need this to get back to Seattle and into my client’s hands.

USPS (together): What, you want us to pay for it? We can’t do that. We can give you the Customer Service number.

J: A phone number? And what am I supposed to do? Try to convince someone over the phone who cannot see the package that it was wrong of the Seattle office to declare this undeliverable and return it? Go through everything we just went through here in person?

USPS (as one): Yes.

J: I suppose if right now I rip this envelope open and send the material myself in another envelope it will reduce my chances of proving my case?

USPS (doing a choreographed jig now): Yes.

J: So there’s really nothing you can do to take care of this right here in person right now?

USPS (one stalwart respresentative holding firm to the corporate line): No. If you call now you might just catch someone in the office. Otherwise it’s Friday afternoon, and . . . . . . .  Sorry. Next.

<fade to black>

Narrator (softly, a catch in his voice): Dumbfounded, at a total loss for words, our wounded hero turns from his bespectacled foes united behind their counter of fortification and walls of bureaucratic obstinacy. He shakes his head, trying to clear the fog of incomprehension that threatens, trying to dislodge the veil of sub-par customer service that clouds his vision. By the time he has somewhat successfully done so he finds himself outside the doors to the chamber of secrets, alone and poised upon the crossroads of his life. Our hero looks down and finds his weapon of choice in his hand. It had been his natural reaction for dealing with dilemma.

Anonymous voice in the darkness: Hello, you’ve reached Mistress X (name kept secret to protect — aww, I don’t know who). Your call is important to the USPS, but I am unable to answer your call at this time. Please leave your name and number and the reason for your call after the tone. I will get back to you just as soon as I can . . .

J: Yes, I was just at one of your offices and let me tell you a story . . .

Narrator (all bravado now): Stay tuned till next time, when our sure-footed and proud warrior rises to the challenge and rocks the foundations of the world with his answer. Will he call for vengeance, or simply charge the windmills once again . . . after he quits waiting for Mistress X to call him back?

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: RBE  | 5 Comments
December 09th, 2008 | Author: von Darkmoor

Beowulf, as rendered by Gareth Hinds, is a traditional superhero (sans skintight suit and otherworldly powers). He is a Hercules to his people without being the son of a god. He is the stuff of legend, the makings of myth – and he is a damn good heroic fantasy adventure character any writer would be proud to claim.

One of the oldest heroic sagas relayed from generation to generation, this graphic novel rendition is an excellent contribution to the continuation of the timeless tale. Illustrator Hinds’ (checkout his website linked via the cover image) rather dark and gruesome look is perfect accompaniment for the fierce and violent world of the titular character. Severe lines and stark, bold images thrust their way forward, demanding attention. No single page has half the glossy beauty of a single Scion cell, yet every page of Beowulf rivals any Scion page in ferocity and drama. Every character bloody and savage, Beowulf most of all, yet that is not the sum of the man or his world. Emotional depths are explored and even dredged, as duty, sorrow, memory, honor, courage and even fear are brought to the forefront via text and art. Sword & Sorcery lovers can find no better graphic telling of this tale.

There’s not much left to say. I’m not about to review the saga of Beowulf, man or epic poem. After all, I’ve only ever read abridged versions such as this. Someday, if I ever do read the 3,182 line poem, I’ll review it then. Otherwise, would I recommend Beowulf as illustrated by Gareth Hinds to my friends? Yes.

Rating 3.50 out of 5
[?]
Category: 2008, YES  | 4 Comments
December 08th, 2008 | Author: von Darkmoor

Anyone interested in taking a peek at the latest Ray Bradbury title soon to be released? Get in line, buddy.

HarperCollins has a unique program called First Look: Read and Review Tomorrow’s Books Todaythat allows folks (sorry my Canadian (and other foreign) readers – USofA folks only) to register for consideration to be one of 10 advance reviewers for a new title of your choice. Each month, ‘contestants’ are free to register for the title(s) of their choice by simply providing a reason why they wish to read the particular book. HaperCollins does the rest by randomly drawing 10 readers who have roughly two months to submit their reviews. Books are shipped to your door and credited to whatever name you give them. If you’re interested in reviewing or at least reading Advance Reading Editions (why you’d want to do the latter without the former is beyond me, as AREs generally are sans art and extras like ToCs and indexes), it doesn’t get much easier than this. Non-paying, of course, but who’s really paying for book reviews these days?

Still here? Oh, I know what you want. Don’t even think about it. Bradbury’s latest, We’ll Always Have Paris, is all mine. :)

Rating 3.50 out of 5
[?]
December 08th, 2008 | Author: von Darkmoor

I kicked off 2008 with a return to Scion, the CrossGen Comics hybrid modernization of King Arthur’s knights and Dr. Moreau’s mutants set in a mixed world of hi-tech science and medieval fantasy. The cover to the left is that on the traveler version, the more compact size I found at Half-Price Books.

I enjoyed discovering Scion (and Sojourn, another CrossGen title) in 2006 (benefits of a local library), and had just about become hooked on the series when I discovered CrossGen had ceased operations. Disappointed, I still decided to pursue collection of at least this story. Writer Ron Marz delivers the goods yet again – but it’s penciler Jim Cheung and the inkers and colorists to whom I owe much of my enthusiasm. Flipping through the pages of these graphic novels is like standing at an open Baskin-Robbins freezer: my eyes don’t know where to rest and my drool is making a mess of things.

The unique combination of medevial-era fantasy (replete with kings and magic and dragons) and cutting-edge science fiction (replete with laser-cannons, hovercraft, and light-saber-like swords) is still a shocker. The combo is actually an assault on the intellect – if there was time to scrutinize it. The always stunning artwork manages to keep such analysis at bay, however. The intriguing story line – complete with enough twists to keep fans of the television show Lost happy – fulfills its duty by drawing the reader through the tale, while the awesomely rendered art propels the reader ever onward without pause for breath . . . even when left gazing at a single page for moments on end.

In this edition, nestled between the chapters of savage storytelling and sweet artwork are interesting little tidbits on the history of the series and on writing/drawing tropes. I found these an excellent addition to the volume and I am extremely sad that such a series and its company died out, regardless of the circumstances. I think the intentions behind the company, its series, and this Scion series in particular, were good and originally carried out strongly and brilliantly. Somewhere along the line things fell out of control however, and what once began as someone’s dream is again no more. Would I recommend Scion #1: Conflict of Conscience as written by Ron Marz and penciled by Jim Cheung to my friends? Yes. And I’d tell them to be sure to wear a bib (for the drool).

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: 2008, YES  | 2 Comments
December 07th, 2008 | Author: von Darkmoor

Confession: I hadn’t read a single one of the Flashing Swords anthologies edited by Lin Carter until this one. I am now proud to say I own all five books, three of them in dust-jacketed hardcover. However, my first foray into the series ended in dismay.

So it is in somewhat of a similar state I now find myself, as I finally type the words of my appreciation (or lack thereof) of four of the larger names in sword and sorcery history: Fritz Leiber. Poul Anderson. Lin Carter. Jack Vance. I’ve read works by Vance and Carter before, and I own several unread words of Anderson and Leiber. So more firsts for me.

Carter’s dedication to Robert E. Howard – “without whom we would all probably be writing nothing but science fiction stories” – sums of the purpose and pursuit of these anthologies - themselves the result of the loose confederation of heroic fantasy writers named SAGA, the Swordsmen and Sorcerers’ Guild of America. Carter pens an inviting introduction that covers the origin of both sword and sorcery (S&S) the genre and the term. His intro further provides a somewhat timeline of S&S events and authors, tells of the creation of SAGA, and brings us to the state of events in 1970’s speculative fiction writing and publishing. It was a pleasurable read, as was getting into the first of the stories.

“The Sadness of the Executioner” by Fritz Leiber is by far the most enjoyable tale in the book. The first Fafhrd and Gray Mouser story I’ve read, it definitely made me desire to read more. This is a fun tongue-in-cheek appreciation of true warriors under spur-of-the-moment dire circumstances and their ability to calmly handle said events. Oh, and it’s an interesting take on the figure of Death. Mired as I have been in the novels of today and the slush of tomorrow, it was definitely a sweet thing to read classic writing such as this again. Such pleasurable use of language! If this tale is indicative of the remaining F&GM tales, I will be reading them in rather short order. Speaking of short, while I believe it was written in the perfect amount of words, when comparing this particular tale to the others in the anthology it was much too short.

“Morreion” by Jack Vance apparently comes from his Dying Earth series. I’ve read Vance, but not that series, and I am aware how much both author and series are referred to and imitated. I haven’t felt the urge to read the series before and this story does nothing to change that. Actually, that is unfair of me. It encourages me not to read it at all. Not quite halfway through it already was much too long. In a nutshell: numerous silly and sad magic-users float around the universe in a magic castle trying to one-up each other. There is a completly B.S. ending that left me dissatisfied and disgusted. A very long story that truly accomplishes nothing.

I turned to Poul Anderson’s “The Merman’s Children” with hope, eager to rid my memory of vestiges of its last read. Hope only somewhat met by a thorough drama, yet a drama minus its dramatic flair. A better written story somewhat unfeelingly told and frustrating beyond belief for never delivering upon the anticipation it built. Despite being about the spectacular no where near spectacular, ultimately as far removed from “The Sadness of the Executioner” as “Morreion” is from this.

Finally comes Lin Carter’s turn, and he takes full advantage of the stage Vance and Anderson have left him. After all, it shouldn’t take much to top either of their efforts. And so we meet Amalric in “The Higher Heresies of Oolimar,” the first of the Immortal’s tales. All who read S&S know of Carter’s love of the colorful, the exaggerated, the romantic. Amalric and this tale do not disappoint! While this does provide some entertainment, after a bit it becomes too much. Too many over-the-top names both colorful and crazy at first distract, then defy, then simply deter (as in the case of Vance’s story). Unlike “Morreion,” however, “The Higher Heresies of Oolimar” maintained its amusing quality. Carter provides the most apt description of his tale within the tale itself:

The index, or digest, proved impenetrable. The Oolimarine theology seemed to be half abstract philosophy and half higher mathematics, and employed a bewildering and cloudy terminology uniquely it own. Every other word seemed to be capitalized, and every term seemed to have half-a-hundred synonyms, and it was almost impossible, on any given page, to figure out what the author was talking about.

I would read further of Amalric’s life.

In conclusion, while the concept is sound and the results from almost 35 years later spectacular; while the authors and Carter’s introductions of them are illuminating and inspiring; while Leiber’s tale is simply outstanding and totally addicting, the rest . . . . hmmm. Using my simple memorable-regrettable-average (won-loss-tie) calculation to rate the stories, the anthology garners but a single win. At 1 - 1 – 2 (50%), I am forced to do the unbelievable. Would I recommend Flashing Swords #1 edited by Lin Carter to my friends? Surprising even myself, no.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: 2007, NO  | 14 Comments