Archive for the Category » Books «

March 03rd, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

The DGLA Ravenheart will be awarded to the best Fantasy Book Jacket/Artist of 2009. Both the Ravenheart and the Morningstar Awards join the David Gemmell Legend Award now in its second year. Each of these awards are named after works and in honor of the legendary heroic fantasy author David Gemmell. I’ve already cast my votes for the best fantasy novel and the best cover art/jacket of 2009…I’ll have to skip the best newcomer/debut of the year though, as I’ve read only one of the contenders.

For your viewing pleasure I’ve brought along my top choices for the Ravenheart. There were many spectacular works of art and design, several of which I thoroughly enjoyed and would have caused me to pause and pick them up were I to see them in the store. These five do something better: they catch my eye and hold my attention here online. They make me look up the book information, the artist’s portfolio, and reviews by folks I rely upon. Here, in no particular order, are my favorite four:

and here is the cover with the art that most closely matches its title:

Rating 3.50 out of 5
[?]
March 01st, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

Always a nice thing to share in the joy of another’s success, especially that of a friend. No stranger to publication in the short and paperback fiction markets, this will be Nathan’s first hardcover. Also new will be the market: YA. Yes, the hard action adventure author of numerous rocking – and often bloody – sci-fi, fantasy, and swashbuckling tales, will soon be the published author of his first pre-teen novel.

Congrats Nathan!

Rating 4.33 out of 5
[?]
Category: Authors, Books  | Leave a Comment
February 28th, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor


Watch CBS News Videos Online

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Books  | 6 Comments
February 18th, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor
Reprinted from “The Book Marketing Expert newsletter,” a free ezine offering book promotion and publicity tips and techniques. http://www.amarketingexpert.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From Book to Bestseller:

What it Takes to Crack the List (and why you might not want to)

~ by Penny C. Sansevieri, Editor

In the past 15 months, we’ve had 10 books on the bestseller list. When I say “bestseller” I mean major lists: New York Times, Wall Street Journal, et al. Still, even after numerous books and a variety of lists, the “list” itself still confounded me, so I decided to do a little research to find out what it really takes to hit a list.

First off, the term “hit a list” can mean hitting a bestseller list at any point of entry. This can even be the bottom 100. Many books that hit a list are never viewed by consumers, they land there, stay for a week, maybe longer or shorter and then vanish. The numbers and metric for this can be tricky and in fact, not entirely accurate. If you’ve ever tried to hit a list and found yourself disgusted with the odds, I hope this article sheds some light on the ins and outs of how the process works. I do recommend though that you do some research on your own, there are some excellent blog posts out there that look at the finite pieces of these lists and how they are constructed.

Let’s look at the facts. Bestseller lists vary by season, market, and genre. We’ll start with seasons.

Surprisingly enough, how many copies you need to sell of your book will often depend on when you release it. Pre-Christmas releases, for example, require bigger numbers than a release that happens in May. Why is this? Well, the holiday should speak for itself and the same is true for key Fall months like September. The hotter the month (not in temperature but in publishing releases) the harder it is to get onto a list.

The next piece of this is reporting. It might surprise you to learn that not all reporting is accurate. Never mind the fact that reporting can be slow; you could hit 20,000 sales of your book in October but not see this reporting until November, for example, but they can also be inaccurate – and there’s a whole market share that’s never reported on. Technical, scholarly, law-related books can make up over 2/3 of the book market and are never reported on. Christian titles are also not reported on. You might say, “Well, what about The Shack?” This Christian title hit a list because it was sold en masse in retail outlets and not sequestered to Christian retailers that don’t get the benefit of reporting to the lists.

Finally, let’s look at list structure. Each list pulls book data differently, meaning that the New York Times does not pull trade book data whereas the USA Today list does. USA Today also pulls these titles onto a single list whereas the New York Times divides these lists up by genre.

A friend of mine who spent years in publishing once told me that publishing is all about perception, and this is very true. What she meant by this is that print runs (publishers refer to these as “advance print runs”) as well as any and all advance buzz a book is getting will also help it land on a list. Generally a book that is just “born” into the publishing world with no buzz, advanced reviews, etc. won’t capture the attention of a big list. The author might hit it well locally, but generally not nationally unless (like in the case of The Shack) there is some online viral buzz that builds. There is also the consideration of sales surge. This surge often happens during a very short period of time and doesn’t always have to equate to huge numbers, it’s the velocity of the push that matters. An associate of mine in publishing once told me that a book she was working with only sold 4,000 copies before it landed on a major list. The smallness of the number is staggering when you think about it. Keep in mind that this book hit a list during a slow period, too, so that also worked in its favor.

Also, lists aren’t always based on sales. The New York Times, for instance, is known for a non-sale list, meaning that they circulate to 37 reporting (book) stores to find out whether a book is doing well. If it’s being talked about by the stores, it will often make the list.

When you do the research, you realize that there is no way *anyone* can “rig” a list and promise you bestseller status. Well, there is one way: by buying up a lot of copies of a book within a short period of time. There have been companies promising bestseller status that do this, but once their warehouses are uncovered the companies often fold. Also, these books at some point will flood the system yet again, usually as used copies on Amazon, which will compete for sales attention with their newly printed counterparts. Any way you slice it, buying up your own books with the hope of getting on a list should be the last thing on your marketing agenda.

Marketing your book with an eye on the bestseller list is great, but much like waiting for Oprah to call, it’s not a preferred way to gain or keep your marketing stride. Instead, focus on things you can actually control that will benefit you, perhaps regional promotion or an aggressive Internet campaign. Or how about reading groups both online and off? Slanting your campaign to hit a list isn’t a great idea, in fact it’s often the worst thing you can do. Yes, there are books that publishers know will hit a list right out of the gate. These titles are generally celeb or news driven, but for the most part 99.9% of all bestseller status is unpredictable. Gather your marketing chips and put them on a bet that is more likely to pay off. I know authors we’ve worked with who get the word from their publisher that their book just hit a list and they’ll often call me elated and excited. Now that’s a wonderful surprise.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Books, Publishing  | Leave a Comment
February 12th, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

I’m brand new to Ben Thompson’s Badass of the Week site – and I love it! With  a fine mixture of fact and fiction heroes, this is a must-read site of awesomeness! I’m off to order his book BADASS: A Relentless Onslaught of the Toughest Warlords, Vikings, Samurai, Pirates, Gunfighters and Military Commanders to Ever Live right now!

Rating 4.50 out of 5
[?]
Category: Authors, Books  | 3 Comments
January 19th, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

Of all the stats being thrown about in the discussion of e-publishing, e vs. print sales, e-readers, e-this and e-that, this is the very first stat to grab my attention. Literally twist my head to look right at it.

Publishers Weekly sites a recent 9-month survey “of hundreds of e-book consumers” by the Book Industry Study Group (BISG), and says that it is the first of three such reports due in 2010. The Consumer Attitudes Toward E-Book Reading study claims to be “[t]he first comprehensive survey of U.S. e-book consumers’ behavior and preferences…with the goal of understanding their real-time purchase and reading habits.”

The intentions of all statisticians and statistical displays of course being all good and well and all that, if you’re lucky enough to be a BISG member, you can read the entire survey and view the exact stats for a measly $150. Outside that slim chance, however, you’ll have to rely upon the relayed opinions of ‘hundreds’ of surveyed e-book consumers when evaluating this revelation. Disregarding also such phenomenally blatant misrepresentations by Amazon as its claims that e-books outsold print.

It can be agreed that consumers of books, or reading material, are altering their reading and purchasing habits. The economy is certainly a factor in this, as is society, status, cultural mores, et cetera et cetera. Figure just plain interest as well. Have any studies distinguished between the e-material consumption of fiction, non, and reference? Between age and income levels? Reasons for e-consumption? Location of said consumption? All of these factors play into the results of a survey that is conducted upon the slimmest of market shares.

After all, the percentage of the public who are actually reading (anything at all) shrinks yearly. Restrict it further to those of technological bent and you’ve effectively severely reduced the numbers by eliminating the techno-deficient, be it self-imposed (via reasons of anti- or aging or desire) or economic (via reasons of cost or time or locale). So, while a stat that declares “nearly 20% of respondents say they’ve stopped buying print books in favor of buying e-books” is enough to give one whiplash, ensuing reflection upon its source helps one realize that change has not occurred near as much as we are led to believe.

Nor so much as Amazon’s Jeff Bezos may believe, despite his apparently saying “that he believes that the print book will eventually disappear” (quite possibly way back in this 2007 interview with Charlie Rose – at 54 minutes long, I don’t have the time nor inclination to listen, but I haven’t been able to find any other direct attribution).

I am certain that both the number of folks reading electronically and purchasing e-texts will increase, especially in the environments of academia and industry. I am equally certain that hard copy texts will not vanish from Earth.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
January 15th, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

Rogue Blades Entertainment’s entry in this year’s Preditors & Editors Readers’ Poll more than held its own on the individual story level. With 10 of the 21 stories in Rage of the Behemoth appearing in the final cut as of the close of voting last night, that’s pretty darn sweet in my view. All of those authors should be very happy, especially the three who so far appear in the Top 10.

Final placements won’t be revealed for a bit, but as of right now this is how things stand:

  • Short Story Science Fiction/Fantasy
    • 1-T — Yaggoth-Voor, Bruce Durham
    • 6 — Poisonous Redemption, Kate Martin
    • 10-T — Where the Shadow Falls, TW Williams
    • 14-T — Thunder Canyon, Jeff Draper
    • 16-T — Vasily and the Beast Gods, Daniel R. Robichaud
    • 17-T — As from His Lair, the Wild Beast, Michael Ehart
    • 17-T — The Wolf of Winter, Bill Ward
    • 18-T — Portrait of a Behemoth, Richard K. Lyon & Andrew J. Offutt
    • 18-T — Runner of the Hidden Ways, Jason Thummel
    • 18-T — Beyond the Reach of His Gods, Brian Ruckley
  • Anthology
    • 21-T — Rage of the Behemoth
  • Artist
    • 20-T — Johnney Perkins
  • Book Art
    • 19-T — Rage of the Behemoth, Didier Normand

~~~~~~

Hat’s off to many other friends and acquaintances for their multiple showings as well, folks such as Cyberwizard Productions and Abandoned Towers; Residential Aliens, SFReader, Black Gate, Beneath Ceasless Skies, Heroic Fantasy Quarterly, Ricasso Press, GUD, EDF, Richard H Fay, Grasping for the Wind, M.D. Jackson – and numerous others I apologize for not listing.

A grand beginning to 2010 and much publishing success to us all!

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
November 17th, 2009 | Author: von Darkmoor

It’s been attained. While I won’t post a review just now, I simply could not stay silent. I could not resist posting that I have finally read my first perfect* book.

Steven Erikson’s Reaper’s Gale garners a 10-out-of-10 rank from me. An outstanding work that will influence me for a long time. As will the entire Malazan Book of the Fallen series. I had seriously considered rereading the entire 10-book series after the final title is released and read by 2011 – this book has convinced me that I must. Immediately. Do. So. And I have not reread a book since high school. There’s simply too many yet to read.

I encourage every reader of the speculative, definitely every lover of the heroically epic fantastical, to read Erikson’s series. His books – and the novella trilogy set in the same world (and even Ian Cameron Esslemont’s companion novels) – are the definitive fantasy series. Period. Tolkien, Lewis, Howard, Leiber – all may be fathers of aspects of the genre (and by no means do I deny Those That Came Before), but Erikson is their prodigy, theirs and an offspring of Cook and Gemmell. He is true heir to their thrones, a hero himself who has tossed all usurpers aside. He writes the epitome of what I love to read, what I want to publish, what I strive to write.

Here then, are the titles of The Malazan Book of the Fallen, as published and as I rank them. Regardless of my ranking, regardless of their stand-alone characteristics, I strongly recommend reading them in order. And the novellas.

Publication Chronological Order

  1. Gardens of the Moon (1999)
  2. Deadhouse Gates (2000)
  3. Memories of Ice (2001)
  4. House of Chains (2002)
  5. Midnight Tides (2004)
  6. The Bonehunters (2006)
  7. Reaper’s Gale (2007)
  8. Toll the Hounds (2008)
  9. Dust of Dreams (2009)
  10. The Crippled God (forthcoming)

von Darkmoor’s Rank Order & Reviews

  1. Reaper’s Gale (7)                            10.0
  2. Memories of Ice (3)                          9.5
  3. Midnight Tides (5)                            9.5
  4. Deadhouse Gates (2)                       9.0
  5. Gardens of the Moon (1)                 8.5
  6. The Bonehunters (6)                        8.5
  7. House of Chains (4)                          8.0

Seven books, 9.0 average rating. When I finished Memories of Ice, I never anticipated finding another 9.5 in the same series. After Midnight Tides, I never imagined a 10.0 would arrive. For that matter, I scarcely believed I would ever find a 10.0 book. In the past I’d said as much in explaining my reviewing methods, believing that holding the 10-spot open allowed me to always be searching to fill it. Now I shall eternally be using it in comparison. Every single title in this series has been given a ‘Yes’ recommendation in review by von Darkmoor. No matter the rating, each is indispensable. No matter its 8.0 rating, without House of Chains, Reaper’s Gale does not attain its 10.0 mark. Looked at in one way, Deadhouse Gates is also deserving of a 9.5. Without Gardens of the Moon, the addiction does not begin. Amazing.

Tomorrow I start Toll the Hounds. Perhaps I will not sleep this night.

*’Perfect’ as in it scored 10 points out of an available 10 points. I do understand that there is no such thing as perfection. But this book is pretty darn close.

Rating 4.33 out of 5
[?]
Category: 2009, Authors, Books, von Darkmoor  | Tags:  | 3 Comments
September 14th, 2009 | Author: von Darkmoor

…our tastes grow coarser and the life of the imagination grows smaller,” says Stephen King in his latest The Pop of King culture column for Entertainment Weekly (Sept 18th). I agree with his statement, though not so much with the entirety of his argument.

King takes a look at the changes within four of the biggest entertainment vehicles and cries foul. Since he speaks not only with the authority of an American consumer of pop culture, but as a member of it, he’s mostly correct. Any serious connoisseur of Hollywood movies has been decrying the evolution (or devolution) of serious movies for some time now. Apparently to no avail, as King points out, for one merely has to check the local movie house listings to find the latest drivel repeated ad nauseum, while – unless one checks regularly – the finer movies cycle through quicker than Lance Armstrong visits La Crouzille. This is nothing new, however deplorable it may be. Why, even today I heard evidence of yet another loss of creativity: the first remaking of a John Wayne movie is in the works.

King touches upon network television and leaves a tip on telling just how popular one’s favorite show is: pay attention to the ads. Consider how much primetime advertising costs and compare how many blue chip advertisers there are for every Tom, Dick, and Harry advertiser. Again – nothing new here; longtime viewers have been saying quality shows vacated the ‘free’ side of television long ago.

As for radio – and speaking as an owner – King says it’s just about kaput. Morning talk show voices and talk radio are just about all that’s garnering attention – and advertising. Seems radio is about to follow newspapers and disappear off the face of the earth. Advertising inundation, especially in this medium, has wreaked its havoc. After all, I can’t name a single person who, given the choice between having uninterrupted music listening or not, ever chooses the radio.

Then there is print. Skip the newspapers and even the magazines; except for the niche markets everyone but them has already been to their funerals. King speaks only of books. Specifically of their demise as viable quality entertainment due to the encroachment of ebooks. Here’s where I am not of like mind. Granted, as an author commanding many digit advances he has every right to be concerned about who’ll be paying them once every book becomes an ebook. But I think that’s a valid concern today regardless of ebooks. No matter who the author is, today’s publishers cannot afford to shell out mega-advances – and they are foolish to continue doing so. That’s another post. King’s primary concern here is the quality of the ebooks that will soon be replacing print books en masse. Or so he fears.

King worries that ebooks will be the end of ‘great publishers and layers of editing’ – and thus quality. He is also pessimistic about the currently established $9.99 price, declaring it non-profit making and simply a ploy to hook addicted readers on cheap product. He is right to compare the process as he sees it to the drug trade, for we are agreed on one point: “Good stories are dope.” While every reader has his/her own favorite supplier, the addiction to good storytelling isn’t going away. It’s in humanity’s genes. And that’s where King and I differ. Instead of trying to (or bemoaning the fact he can’t) force the new market delivery mechanism to fit the current way of doing business, he should be encouraging – nay, demanding – the ways of doing business in the publishing world adjust to the new technologies. There will always be those who want print editions; there will always be hard copy collectors and autograph fans. Yet in today’s entertainment market, where the target markets are glutted upon easily accessible and quickly consumed electronic media, e-technologies are the future. To expect such products to conform to today’s historically inept and absurdly crooked publishing traditions is ridiculous.

Certainly there is a risk of lesser quality. As evidenced by the other media it seems inevitable. But it’s not equitable. Radio and television never had ‘editing’; censuring, sure. But they’re advertising driven medias and have been almost since the beginning. Movies? Consumption driven and, so long as the younger market is the primary target, geared to a self -generating and -propagating dumbed-down society. Print has consistently been the market with ’standards’ of professionalism. Simply because the deliver of this medium is transferring from actual paper and ink to monitors and pixels of all sizes and formats is no reason to bemoan the end of those standards.

In the end, it all comes down to money anyway. Every consumer will spend exactly the amount of cash they believe necassary and worthy of their entertainment time. Being the best quality and value at the moment of their purchase decision can’t hurt.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Books, Musical, Visual Arts  | 2 Comments
July 06th, 2009 | Author: von Darkmoor

Amazon has remedied the situation: Rage of the Behemoth can now be found on their virtual shelves. Go there. Post your reviews. Discuss the book. Buy it here. :)

Thank you for your support.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Books, RBE  | Leave a Comment