Archive for the Category » Publishing «

February 18th, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor
Reprinted from “The Book Marketing Expert newsletter,” a free ezine offering book promotion and publicity tips and techniques. http://www.amarketingexpert.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From Book to Bestseller:

What it Takes to Crack the List (and why you might not want to)

~ by Penny C. Sansevieri, Editor

In the past 15 months, we’ve had 10 books on the bestseller list. When I say “bestseller” I mean major lists: New York Times, Wall Street Journal, et al. Still, even after numerous books and a variety of lists, the “list” itself still confounded me, so I decided to do a little research to find out what it really takes to hit a list.

First off, the term “hit a list” can mean hitting a bestseller list at any point of entry. This can even be the bottom 100. Many books that hit a list are never viewed by consumers, they land there, stay for a week, maybe longer or shorter and then vanish. The numbers and metric for this can be tricky and in fact, not entirely accurate. If you’ve ever tried to hit a list and found yourself disgusted with the odds, I hope this article sheds some light on the ins and outs of how the process works. I do recommend though that you do some research on your own, there are some excellent blog posts out there that look at the finite pieces of these lists and how they are constructed.

Let’s look at the facts. Bestseller lists vary by season, market, and genre. We’ll start with seasons.

Surprisingly enough, how many copies you need to sell of your book will often depend on when you release it. Pre-Christmas releases, for example, require bigger numbers than a release that happens in May. Why is this? Well, the holiday should speak for itself and the same is true for key Fall months like September. The hotter the month (not in temperature but in publishing releases) the harder it is to get onto a list.

The next piece of this is reporting. It might surprise you to learn that not all reporting is accurate. Never mind the fact that reporting can be slow; you could hit 20,000 sales of your book in October but not see this reporting until November, for example, but they can also be inaccurate – and there’s a whole market share that’s never reported on. Technical, scholarly, law-related books can make up over 2/3 of the book market and are never reported on. Christian titles are also not reported on. You might say, “Well, what about The Shack?” This Christian title hit a list because it was sold en masse in retail outlets and not sequestered to Christian retailers that don’t get the benefit of reporting to the lists.

Finally, let’s look at list structure. Each list pulls book data differently, meaning that the New York Times does not pull trade book data whereas the USA Today list does. USA Today also pulls these titles onto a single list whereas the New York Times divides these lists up by genre.

A friend of mine who spent years in publishing once told me that publishing is all about perception, and this is very true. What she meant by this is that print runs (publishers refer to these as “advance print runs”) as well as any and all advance buzz a book is getting will also help it land on a list. Generally a book that is just “born” into the publishing world with no buzz, advanced reviews, etc. won’t capture the attention of a big list. The author might hit it well locally, but generally not nationally unless (like in the case of The Shack) there is some online viral buzz that builds. There is also the consideration of sales surge. This surge often happens during a very short period of time and doesn’t always have to equate to huge numbers, it’s the velocity of the push that matters. An associate of mine in publishing once told me that a book she was working with only sold 4,000 copies before it landed on a major list. The smallness of the number is staggering when you think about it. Keep in mind that this book hit a list during a slow period, too, so that also worked in its favor.

Also, lists aren’t always based on sales. The New York Times, for instance, is known for a non-sale list, meaning that they circulate to 37 reporting (book) stores to find out whether a book is doing well. If it’s being talked about by the stores, it will often make the list.

When you do the research, you realize that there is no way *anyone* can “rig” a list and promise you bestseller status. Well, there is one way: by buying up a lot of copies of a book within a short period of time. There have been companies promising bestseller status that do this, but once their warehouses are uncovered the companies often fold. Also, these books at some point will flood the system yet again, usually as used copies on Amazon, which will compete for sales attention with their newly printed counterparts. Any way you slice it, buying up your own books with the hope of getting on a list should be the last thing on your marketing agenda.

Marketing your book with an eye on the bestseller list is great, but much like waiting for Oprah to call, it’s not a preferred way to gain or keep your marketing stride. Instead, focus on things you can actually control that will benefit you, perhaps regional promotion or an aggressive Internet campaign. Or how about reading groups both online and off? Slanting your campaign to hit a list isn’t a great idea, in fact it’s often the worst thing you can do. Yes, there are books that publishers know will hit a list right out of the gate. These titles are generally celeb or news driven, but for the most part 99.9% of all bestseller status is unpredictable. Gather your marketing chips and put them on a bet that is more likely to pay off. I know authors we’ve worked with who get the word from their publisher that their book just hit a list and they’ll often call me elated and excited. Now that’s a wonderful surprise.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Books, Publishing  | Leave a Comment
January 19th, 2010 | Author: von Darkmoor

Of all the stats being thrown about in the discussion of e-publishing, e vs. print sales, e-readers, e-this and e-that, this is the very first stat to grab my attention. Literally twist my head to look right at it.

Publishers Weekly sites a recent 9-month survey “of hundreds of e-book consumers” by the Book Industry Study Group (BISG), and says that it is the first of three such reports due in 2010. The Consumer Attitudes Toward E-Book Reading study claims to be “[t]he first comprehensive survey of U.S. e-book consumers’ behavior and preferences…with the goal of understanding their real-time purchase and reading habits.”

The intentions of all statisticians and statistical displays of course being all good and well and all that, if you’re lucky enough to be a BISG member, you can read the entire survey and view the exact stats for a measly $150. Outside that slim chance, however, you’ll have to rely upon the relayed opinions of ‘hundreds’ of surveyed e-book consumers when evaluating this revelation. Disregarding also such phenomenally blatant misrepresentations by Amazon as its claims that e-books outsold print.

It can be agreed that consumers of books, or reading material, are altering their reading and purchasing habits. The economy is certainly a factor in this, as is society, status, cultural mores, et cetera et cetera. Figure just plain interest as well. Have any studies distinguished between the e-material consumption of fiction, non, and reference? Between age and income levels? Reasons for e-consumption? Location of said consumption? All of these factors play into the results of a survey that is conducted upon the slimmest of market shares.

After all, the percentage of the public who are actually reading (anything at all) shrinks yearly. Restrict it further to those of technological bent and you’ve effectively severely reduced the numbers by eliminating the techno-deficient, be it self-imposed (via reasons of anti- or aging or desire) or economic (via reasons of cost or time or locale). So, while a stat that declares “nearly 20% of respondents say they’ve stopped buying print books in favor of buying e-books” is enough to give one whiplash, ensuing reflection upon its source helps one realize that change has not occurred near as much as we are led to believe.

Nor so much as Amazon’s Jeff Bezos may believe, despite his apparently saying “that he believes that the print book will eventually disappear” (quite possibly way back in this 2007 interview with Charlie Rose – at 54 minutes long, I don’t have the time nor inclination to listen, but I haven’t been able to find any other direct attribution).

I am certain that both the number of folks reading electronically and purchasing e-texts will increase, especially in the environments of academia and industry. I am equally certain that hard copy texts will not vanish from Earth.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
April 09th, 2009 | Author: von Darkmoor

Peter Newbould, Borders commercial director, says:

“Recommendation is still the thing that makes people want to read books—more so than if a book is being sold at half price.”

Borders will soon be unveiling a “Have Your Say—customer recommends” program in which they entice book buyers to return a review of the title bought for 20% off their next title bought. Not a bad incentive; not a bad plan. Borders will be using the reviews online and in-store, and placing a select number of reviewed titles at the front of their stores.

This is a good thing. Positive word-of-mouth is the best seller of all things (the inverse being equally true – that negative words have the most dire effects upon sales). Further, there is an opportunity here for authors with little (perhaps even no?) shelf space to improve their store presence.

The long and short: Recommend titles by Rogue Blades Entertainment and you will directly impact sales :)

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Books, Publishing  | Leave a Comment
March 31st, 2009 | Author: von Darkmoor
~ for those of you coming to this post via the RBE interview, you must read from the beginning; you may skip the ending though – you’ve already read it. for those of you who read this and are interested in the rest, you can find the interview here ~

It has been said that all fiction is speculative by its very existence. While in essence true, I believe the triumvirate of fantasy, science fiction, and horror (and all their misbegotten sons and daughters, step-children, and foster kids), as the epitome of what speculative fiction is and can be, deserves all claim to the title. For the key, the very ingredient that most simultaneously appeals and repels those that love and those that hate spec fic, is its lack of a comfort zone. Security. Predictability. Knowability. The greater the degree of uncertainty – the less content both writer and reader are - the greater the speculative nature.

Exploring the everyday, the expected, the eternally empty . . . is not entertaining. It’s distracting. It’s daydreaming. It is a non-stimulating, non-threatening, non-invasive, mind-numbingly routine method of alleviation; just different enough from its readers’ own lives or experiences, perhaps even dreams, to allow them to briefly escape their humdrum existences. Yes, I said escape. Because whoever doesn’t allow themselves to escape while reading fiction shouldn’t waste their time with it. From contemporary thriller to slice-of-life to paranormal horror to romance to Western – if it’s fiction, it’s all escapism. This does not mean that education cannot occur. The reader who cannot or will not learn something, anything – about the world, life, human nature, self - reads only with one intention: to ignore.

Ignore their own life in a pursuit of freedom. Not just any freedom, though. Such readers seek freedom from responsibility and acknowledgment. For brief moments, they can flee their understanding of life as they know it: the dire 6 o’clock news, the dreary weather, the predictable water cooler conversation, the dreaded auto/house/medical bills, the deterioration of the world around them. Reading about another person’s life set in history or in contemporary everyday as they know it provides them only the illusion of disillusionment. Mental exercises that allow readers to briefly exchange their daily existences for imagined but entirely plausible others. Teases that such is not only possible but, most horribly, can be expected . . . making it certain . . . making it mundane. Escapism that does not prohibit learning but is ultimately nothing but buying temporary transference one page at a time.

Readers of the truly speculative fictions go into their reading without anticipating that the tale in their hand could be that of Joey-around-the-corner’s life. While the goal of the writer is to make believable as much as possible of the tale – both author and reader go into the relationship with the complete understanding that all is a lie. Convince me, the reader, that it is not, or possibly not, and you’ve hooked me. Make me feel your uncertainty, increase my uncertainty, and you’ve delivered speculative escapism that does teach or, at the very least, opens my eyes to my own susceptibility and desires.

In addition, each of the spec three offer emotional and intellectual incentives to pursue such escapism. Quite simply, horror evokes fear, immediate survival instinct, curiosity; science fiction stimulates the mind, future survival instinct, curiosity; fantasy creates wonder, current survival instinct, curiosity. Each genre pushes the boundaries of curiosity (and thus accomplishment) by testing humanity’s extremes. My preference is for fantasy. I am more in tune with and interested in the possibilities offered by the powers of magical forces and multitudes of gods while simultaneously being intrigued with and desirous of the elegant simplicity found in the struggle for survival that demands personal, face-to-face decision making and action taking.

Telling a tale of awe and adventure that can take author and reader alike beyond today’s dark headlines and gray clouds is desirable and admirable. Taking us beyond yesterday’s and tomorrow’s headlines and shadows leads to euphoria. I believe I have many such tales within me, tales that should be shared, for to hide them away and to keep them buried is shameful and unworthy. Yet my skills and capabilities do not match my wishes and hopes at this time. So I do something equally noble, equally important. I act midwife to those who can utter, act confidante to those who can dream, act intercessor to those who can write. I will do all in my meager power to deliver to readers the tales of imagination, the poetry of speculation if you will, that births and breathes within each storyteller of the fantastic.

What really drives me to create speculative fiction? Sharing hope and joy and opportunity. Relieving tedious ennui, bringing triumphant smiles, giving life to dreams and dreams to life.

Albert Einstein called imagination “[t]he gift of fantasy” and he claimed it meant more to him than his ability to learn. He said that,

“Imagination is more important than knowledge…. Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
A gift is given, folks. I want to be a gifter of fantasy. I want to take people everywhere.
Rating 4.33 out of 5
[?]
February 17th, 2009 | Author: von Darkmoor

Cool. Anybody use one of these before?

RBE is open to donations . . .

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Books, Publishing  | 7 Comments
February 07th, 2009 | Author: von Darkmoor

Business books that is. Of all time. Ever.

Published February 5th by 800ceoread, this title somewhat intrigues me. Basically it’s a compilation of business title reviews by two very experienced fellows. However, its strong writeup and great subtitle What They Say, Why They Matter, and How They Can Help You drew my attention. I wanted to view their list and note which books I’ve read or at least own. What’s nice is, publisher and authors were kind enough to provide what I sought: the 100 titles.

Their list is not ranked, simply broken into topical chapters, and links to each title (except the two out of print) conveniently for sale by the publisher. My list will mimic their order and simply serve as an inventory of titles so that I can conveniently keep track of my own read and owned titles.

BOOKS IN THE 100 BEST…that I own or have read:

Flow by Mihaly Csikzentmihalyi
Getting Things Done by David Allen
The Effective Executive by Peter Drucker
How to Be a Star at Work by Robert E. Kelley
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People by Stephen R. Covey
How to Win Friends & Influence People by Dale Carnegie
Swim with the Sharks Without Being Eaten Alive by Harvey B. Mackay
The Power of Intuition by Gary Klein
What Should I Do with My Life? by Po Bronson
Oh, the Places You’ll Go by Dr. Seuss/Theodore Geisel
Chasing Daylight by Eugene O’Kelly
On Becoming a Leader by Warren Bennis
The Leadership Moment by Michael Useem
The Leadership Challenge by James M. Kouzes and Barry Z. Posner
Leadership Is an Art by Max De Pree
The Radical Leap by Steve Farber
Control Your Destiny or Someone Else Will by Tichy and Sherman
Leading Change by John P. Kotter
Questions of Character by Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr.
The Story Factor by Annette Simmons
Never Give In! Speeches by Winston Churchill
In Search of Excellence by Thomas J. Peters and Robert H. Waterman, Jr.
Good to Great by Jim Collins
The Innovator’s Dilemma by Clayton M. Christensen
Only the Paranoid Survive by Andrew S. Grove
Who Says Elephants Can’t Dance? by Louis V. Gerstner, Jr.
Discovering the Soul of Service by Leonard Berry
Execution by Larry Bossidy and Ram Charan
Competing for the Future by Gary Hamel and C. K. Prahalad
Influence by Robert B. Cialdini, PhD
Positioning by Al Ries and Jack Trout
A New Brand World by Scott Bedbury with Stephen Fenichell
Selling the Invisible by Harry Beckwith
Zag by Marty Neumeier
Crossing the Chasm by Geoffrey A. Moore
Secrets of Closing the Sale by Zig Ziglar
How to Become a Rainmaker by Jeffrey J. Fox
Why We Buy by Paco Underhill
The Experience Economy by B. Joseph Pine II and James H. Gilmore
Purple Cow by Seth Godin
The Tipping Point by Malcolm Gladwell
Naked Economics by Charles Wheelan
Financial Intelligence by Karen Berman and Joe Knight
The Balanced Scorecard by Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton
The Essential Drucker by Peter Drucker
Out of the Crisis by W. Edwards Deming
Toyota Production System by Taiichi Ohno
Reengineering the Corporation by Michael Hammer and James Champy
The Goal by Eliyahu M. Goldratt and Jeff Cox
The Great Game of Business by Jack Stack with Bo Burlingham
First, Break all the Rules by Marcus Buckingham and Curt Coffman
Now, Discover Your Strengths by Marcus Buckingham and Donald Clifton
The Knowing-Doing Gap by Jeffrey Pfeffer and Robert I. Sutton
The Five Dysfunctions of a Team by Patrick Lencioni
Six Thinking Hats by Edward De Bono
Titan by Ron Chernow
My Years with General Motors by Alfred P. Sloan, Jr.
The HP Way by David Packard
Personal History by Katharine Graham
Moments of Truth by Jan Carlzon
Sam Walton: Made in America by Sam Walton with John Huey
Losing My Virginity by Richard Branson
The Art of the Start by Guy Kawasaki
The E-Myth Revisited by Michael E. Gerber
The Republic of Tea by Mel Ziegler, Patricia Ziegler, and Bill Rosenzweig
The Partnership Charter by David Gage
Growing a Business by Paul Hawken
Guerrilla Marketing by Jay Conrad Levinson
The Monk and the Riddle Randy Komisar with Kent Lineback
McDonald’s: Behind the Arches by John F. Love
American Steel by Richard Preston
The Force by David Dorsey
The Smartest Guys in the Room by Bethany McLean and Peter Elkind
When Genius Failed by Roger Lowenstein
Moneyball by Michael Lewis
Orbiting the Giant Hairball by Gordon MacKenzie
The Art of Innovation by Tom Kelley with Jonathan Littman
Jump Start Your Business Brain by Doug Hall
A Whack on the Side of the Head by Roger Von Oech
The Creative Habit by Twyla Tharp
The Art of Possibility by Rosamund Stone Zander and Benjamin Zander
The Age of Unreason by Charles Handy
Out of Control by Kevin Kelly
The Rise of the Creative Class by Richard Florida
Emotional Intelligence by Daniel Goleman
Driven by Paul R. Lawrence and Nitin Nohria
To Engineer is Human by Henry Petroski
The Wisdom of Crowds by James Surowiecki
Made to Stick by Chip Heath and Dan Heath
The First 90 Days by Michael Watkins
Up the Organization by Robert Townsend
Beyond the Core by Chris Zook
Little Red Book of Selling by Jeffrey Gitomer
What the CEO Wants You to Know by Ram Charan
The Team Handbook by Peter Scholtes, Brian Joiner, and Barbara Streibel
A Business and Its Belief by Thomas J. Watson, Jr.
Lucky or Smart? by Bo Peabody
The Lexus and the Olive Tree by Thomas L. Friedman
Thinkertoys by Michael Michalko
More Than You Know by Michael J. Mauboussin

Not so many, huh? There’s about a dozen or so in there I’m interested in reading. Now that I run a business, perhaps I should find time to read them. If I do, I’ll strongly consider buying them directly from the guys at 800ceoread. You should, too.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]
February 06th, 2009 | Author: von Darkmoor

Over at Genreville, the Rose Fox comments about the upcoming genre issues at PW got a response out of me. She asks what we (her readers) would like PW to cover in these issues. Nice of her to ask, I think. I enjoy Rose’s blogging, where she often asks interesting questions and types quality observations and informs on the publishing industry.

So I tossed a comment in reply and said short genre fiction found in anthologies and collections. Funny I’d mention that, eh? Anyway, just wanted to tell all you von D followers to check out Genreville, cast a couple of comments here, and be sure to reiterate to Rose the necessity of short fiction, especially that found in anthologies and collections offered by RBE!

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Books, Publishing, RBE, Writing  | One Comment
January 25th, 2009 | Author: von Darkmoor

“What in Heaven’s Name Are Big Publishers Thinking?” is an excellent post by Carolyn Howard-Johnson on her Sharing with Writers and Readers blog. Carolyn cites The New York Times article “Puttin’ Off the Ritz: The New Austerity in Publishing” byMotoko Rich, then shares her thoughts on the subject. Both are interesting. Both are illuminating. One is inspiring – Carolyn’s.

If you haven’t visited Sharing with Writers and Readers before, I suggest adding it to your blog roll or your feedblitz and paying attention. Especially if you have a book you wish to make popular. Carolyn’s post doesn’t require anything further from me then the recommendation to read it. Rather, I’m going to spend my time on other observations.

Rich’s article, while presenting the current nature of publishing – at least big house publishing as we know it – is pessimistic. He doesn’t offer hope for the future of the industry; simply spins his tale and shrugs his shoulders at the incongruity of it.  Most discouraging, he doesn’t explore the connotations of several of the lines he types:

For authors it means the prospect of smaller advances and fewer books being acquired.

Cash advances for authors, which have risen in recent years, are being reviewed.

…experimenting with a model that substitutes profit sharing with authors for cash advances…

“The two biggest sucking sounds on profits in our business are on advances and returns,” the wonderful soundbite from Robert S. Miller, president and publisher of the new HarperStudio.

Sorry. I’m not buying it. Let’s put blame where it fair-and-squarely lies: on the shoulders of the big publishers. Not on the author’s advances; not even on the bookseller’s returns, though I am a huge proponent of eliminating, or at least severely restricting, them. Rich spends paragraphs relaying sob stories of editors who must refrain from ‘two-martini lunches’ and houses that must eliminate holiday parties or transform them from galas to pot-lucks. God forbid the desk jockeys give up their corporate Town Cars.

Where’s the voice of reason here, the voice noting the glaringly obviously absent fact here? Where’s the voice pointing out that this industry and all its sundry positions, titles (How many editors does it take to publish a book?), and roles owe 100% of their existence to forces outside themselves? Publishing is not a self-contained industry. No one within its greedy walls creates a dang thing. They simply package and sell the product of other people’s blood, sweat, and tears – hand-delivered by those very same creators. Who is pointing out that what the publishing industry ‘makes’ is absolutely nothing – but money off the backs of people who don’t even work for them! Even Hollywood has to make something by turning one medium into another.

With the advent of print-on-demand (POD) publishing and Internet marketing, anyone with a computer and words to share can sell those words. Just as abolition of the income tax and institution of a consumption tax has earned the eternal enmity of tax accountants, so too, has the abolition and replacement of big-business publishing with POD and viral marketing raised fierce opposition. Better – for the people and use of technology – is not enough for the power-players. They fear change, for change means less money NOW!

Running before the demands of NOW! is a terrible way to conduct any business. The American automotive industry fears non-gas fueled cars. American government fears a non-income tax form of taxation. Publishers fear POD and open bookkeeping. Foreign competition is forcing the first matter; the second seems impervious to change; medium and small press publishers have a chance to slip to the forefront and lead the way for the third.

I don’t like ‘The New Austerity.’ We might as well use the same label on the TARP requirements for executive compensation. I’d rather call them both ‘Common Sense’ – common sense methods of conducting business.

With this mentality, I fear the Rich article sums it best in this quote from Michael Korda, former editor in chief of Simon & Schuster:

“And everybody went back to doing what they were doing before.”

Rating 4.33 out of 5
[?]
Category: Publishing  | 16 Comments
December 16th, 2008 | Author: von Darkmoor

If only it worked that way.

Macmillan – you know, the publisher that just eliminated 64 jobs, froze salaries above $50k, consolidated much of the house in a major restructuring, and is downgrading the annual BookExpo America booth – boss John Sargent hopes so at least. Sargent insists that there will be no reduction in their title list, and explains that these are cost-saving moves being done across the company. Consolidation, retooling, refocusing, reinventing – I like all these terms. Downgrading, combining, eliminating redundancy . . . again, nice-sounding terms. Sounds like outside-of-the-box thinking to me.

I hope it carries over to the marketing side of publishing. To the distribution side. To the contractual side. How about enforcing contract language that limits returns? Now that would be a cost-saving move, wouldn’t it? How about uniformity, even equality, in book promotion? Rather than singularity through brow-beating emphasis, mass appeal of multiple titles. Twenty titles selling 100k copies each is twice as better than one title selling 1mil. I’d think it’s easier to accomplish, too. I’ll have to let you know though.

So much could be said with a title like these words I pulled from Sargent’s mouth (thanks Publishers Weekly!). They’re applicable to far more than just the publishing world, the writing life, the folks who visit here. I know they could be repeated at my place of work. The definitely can be used in my writing. 

And so it comes full circle: the publishing world has the chance to shake things up right now. To reestablish the rules as it were. We are the product providers, aren’t we? We write the words, we produce the texts. The Internet is at our fingertips. Publishers are moving into Hollywood studios – why not into book sellers’ storefronts? They need us more than we need them – if only we would realize that.

Stop doing ineffective things should have been said long ago.

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]
Category: Publishing  | 4 Comments
December 07th, 2008 | Author: von Darkmoor

I sure would have like to attend the Indie & Small Press Book Fair — but it just had to be in New York City, and over St. Nick’s morning, too! In addition to the several sessions I would have enjoyed attending, present were numerous small presses I would someday like to meet. Ah, well, perhaps next year.

Rating 3.50 out of 5
[?]
Category: Books, Publishing, RBE  | Leave a Comment